By: Barry Lindenman
Going off of the general assumption that of the five standard scoring criteria for MMA bouts, clean striking and effective grappling carry more weight than cage control, effective aggressiveness and defense, I would like to propose a possible revision to the current judge’s scorecard.
The proposal calls for segregating the five standardized scoring components into two categories: “major,“ which would encompass all forms of clean strikes (punches, kicks, elbows, etc.) plus grappling, which would include all of the possible forms of ground work. Because these “major” scoring components are more important in the eyes of the fans and more critical in terms of dominating an opponent, this option would suggest that each fighter be given the opportunity to score from 1- 5 points for each of these fighting strategies. In this way, it would give both the standup fighter and the ground fighter equal opportunity to maximize their scoring in his or her preferred style of fighting.
As a secondary scoring category the proposed changes would group the remaining three scoring criteria (cage control, effective aggressiveness and defense) as “minor” scoring components. These criteria should not carry as much scoring influence as the previously stated “major” components. As such, each fighter would only be given an opportunity to score up to 3 points for each of these categories.
Creating an actual separation of these categories would effectively suggest a new scorecard where, in theory, each fighter can score a maximum of 19 points in each round (5 points each for the two “major” scoring criteria and 3 points each for the three “minor” scoring criteria).
Although on the surface, it may seem that the proposed changes would make the judges’ life more complicated than it currently is. In actuality, it should not. Since a judge should already be evaluating the performance of each fighter based on the five standard scoring criteria, this should not be seen as anything new to a judge. What would be different is the simple weighting of the current scoring criteria into its “major” and “minor” components. See the example below as an illustration of how the new scoring could be applied.
It would appear that a revised scorecard is necessary to score MMA rounds that is different from the standard 10 point must system used in boxing. The proposal above achieves two important things: it first separates the scoring criteria into its “major” and “minor” components by allowing more possible points for clean striking and effective grappling than for cage control, aggressiveness and defense. Finally, by scoring the striking and grappling components separately, it levels the playing field between a stand up fighter and a grappler in the minds of the judges who may favor one style over another. Other “judged” sports such as gymnastics, diving and figure stating include multiple scoring criteria for judges to evaluate (i.e. technical component, artistic component, degree of difficulty, etc.). Because of the intrinsic complexity of the sport, it would appear that mixed martial arts could adopt a similar approach.
We are always looking for new talent for the fastest growing US and UK based, Combat website. We have openings for the following positions – Internet Sales Advertising, Boxing Correspondents, MMA Correspondents and voluntary Radio Correspondents. There are also plenty of advertising and sponsorship opportunities available on our website for your business.
If you are a career minded individual and serious about starting a career or continuing your career in combat journalism, our contacts are below.
RCM Main contact: firstname.lastname@example.org
RCM UK & Ireland contact: email@example.com
RCM Greece contact: firstname.lastname@example.org
RCM Radio contact: email@example.com
RCM MMA contact: firstname.lastname@example.org
RCM UK Advertising contact: email@example.com
RCM MMA Advertising contact: firstname.lastname@example.org
Add us to your circle on GOOGLE PLUS Real Combat Media
JOIN OUR BOXING & MMA DISCUSSION FORUMS : REAL COMBAT MEDIA FORUMS
- Real Combat Media Boxing Radio (Episode #1 – 1/21/2013) — FOLLOW AND SHAREBoxing Radio" src="http://realcombatmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/4sb76rhhh.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="300" /> Real Combat Media Boxing Radio Episode #1 *Airs January 21st, 2013- Monday 7pm ET/Tuesday 12am UK-GMT – (will be recorded and available on the link below right after the show if you miss the live episode.) LIVE CALLERS: (347) 324-5998 TO ASK THE HOSTS QUESTIONS- LOG IN TO TWITTER: @REALCOMBATMEDIA FORUM:REAL [...]
- Real Life Boxing Judge, Barry Lindenman breaks down Rocky Balboa vs. Apollo Creed — FOLLOW AND SHARE Scoring the “ROCKY” Rounds By:Barry Lindenman Philadelphia,PA–It’s the classic: the boxing movie by which all other boxing movies are measured against. Surprisingly, after all the times I’ve watched “ROCKY”, albeit as a fan, I’ve never watched the movie and actually scored the rounds, as a boxing judge. Until now. Let me explain. [...]
- A Legit Split from a Boxing Judge Perspective — FOLLOW AND SHARE A Legit Split By: Barry Lindenman When I first started judging professional boxing 13 years ago, I always thought that having a split decision was a failure on the part of the judges, whether it be me or one of my fellow officials. Over the years however, I have begun to take [...]
- A Close Fight vs. A Close Round by Barry Lindenman a professional mma and boxing judge — FOLLOW AND SHARE A Close Fight vs. A Close Round Judging Boxing Part 1 By: Barry Lindenman As a professional boxing judge (and now MMA as well) for the past 12 years, I am often asked by my “non-boxing” friends just how exactly do I score a fight. I am quick to remind them that I [...]
- MMA vs. Boxing: A Judge’s Perspective — FOLLOW AND SHARE MMA vs. Boxing: A Judge’s Perspective By: Barry Lindenman The emergence of mixed martial arts (MMA) as a legitimate sport in recent years has brought with it some of the same challenges in officiating that have plagued the sport of boxing for some time. That is, the perception of non-standard judging criteria, [...]